Everyone else monitors. We verify — and prove the fix.
Everyone else watches the scoreboard. AgentView referees the game — upstream, in your deploy pipeline. Monitoring tools track what AI engines say about you; AgentView fetches your live origin as an AI agent to verify what those agents can actually read, then re-fetches to prove every fix landed — deterministically, in-product, and re-scanned when the standards move or you ship a deploy.
| AgentViewOrigin verification + fix loop | Cloudflare isitagentreadyFree presence checker | ProfoundAI-answer monitoring | Otterly / Peec AIAI-visibility monitoring | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fetches your live origin as an AI agent Sends real ClaudeBot / GPTBot requests to your site — not a scrape of AI-engine answers. | Yes | No | No | No |
| Detects a WAF / CAPTCHA blocking agents at your edge Only an actual fetch-as-agent reveals a challenge silently making you invisible. | Yes | No | No | No |
| Checks the file exists (llms.txt, JSON-LD, robots) | Yes | Yes | No | No |
| Measures HTML → markdown token waste The token tax an agent pays to read your HTML. | Yes | No | No | No |
| Generates copy-paste fixes | Yes | Partial | No | No |
| Verify-now: re-fetches to prove the fix landed A deterministic, in-product proof loop — we re-fetch and show the check go green. | Yes | No | No | No |
| Compounds every verified fix into an outcome dataset A closed fix → verify loop produces this signal — a monitor or presence checker doesn't generate it. | Yes | No | No | No |
| Re-scans when the standards change — we track them for you Agent-readability standards move constantly; you never have to follow them. | Yes | No | No | No |
| Monitors what AI engines say about your brand A different, useful job — answer/citation monitoring. | No | No | Yes | Yes |
| Price Priced per host/subdomain, metered by pages monitored — unlimited developer seats. | $39/mo founder | Free | $399+/mo | $29–95/mo |
Presence checkers confirm a file exists — a static blog can score 100 by dropping stub JSON in /public. Monitoring tools (Profound, Otterly, Peec) watch what AI engines say. Web Performance Tools verifies the same read-layer — but as a $2,500–$10,000/mo human-powered service. AgentView is that verification as deterministic self-serve software: it fetches your origin as an agent, verifies what it can actually read, proves each fix with a re-fetch, and re-scans when the standards move or you ship a deploy.
The workflow layer
The free scan finds the gaps and gives you the fixes. These keep you agent-readable as you ship. In private preview with design partners now — request access and tell us which you want first.
MCP for your coding agent
An MCP server that hands the exact fixes to Cursor or Claude Code, so your agent applies them in your repo. You open the PR.
Request accessCI gate for pull requests
A GitHub Action that fails the build when a change lowers your agent-readiness, with the fixes in the summary. Catches regressions before they merge.
Request accessContinuous monitoring
Re-scans your top pages when the standards move and after every deploy, so you stay readable without watching it.
Request accessHow AgentView compares
- How is AgentView different from Cloudflare's isitagentready.com?
- Cloudflare's checker is presence-only: it confirms a file exists and is well-formed. A static blog can score 100 by dropping stub JSON files in /public. AgentView fetches your live origin as an AI agent and verifies the production path actually serves agents correctly — then re-fetches to prove each fix landed.
- How is AgentView different from Profound, Otterly, or Peec AI?
- Those are monitoring tools: they scrape AI-engine outputs to track what ChatGPT, Perplexity and others say about your brand. They never fetch your origin the way an agent does, so they cannot catch a WAF challenge, a token-bloated page, or a broken markdown negotiation before it costs you a citation. AgentView starts where they stop.
- Why does AgentView cost less than Profound?
- AgentView is deterministic origin verification — it grades your host's real response to agent-style requests, priced per host/subdomain and metered by the pages you monitor, from a $39/mo founder tier ($199 standard) with unlimited developer seats. Profound's Growth plan is $399/mo for AI-answer monitoring, a different and more expensive category. Web Performance Tools verifies the same read-layer we do, but as a bespoke human consultancy — a $7,500–$12,500 two-week audit and $2,500–$10,000/mo retainers, booked through a sales call. AgentView is that verification as instant self-serve software: a transparent score in seconds, from $39/mo, no call required.
- Do I have to keep up with changing agent-readability standards?
- No. Standards for how AI agents read the web change constantly. AgentView tracks them, re-scans your site when they move, and sends you the new fixes — so you never have to follow the standards yourself.